I'm sure the 'right' answer to this is no, but can't help but wonder if those parents who say that they never shout at their children are just fortunate enough to have children that don't need shouting at?!
E isn't right at the moment, and I am taking this into account with regard to his (hideous) behaviour at the moment. My mum even commented yesterday about my neverending patience with him. Fortunately it isn't quite as bad as it was several months ago, I still wonder how the hell I got through that without putting him into care.
However, this morning over breakfast he was getting really silly over it. Asked for cheerios, I gave him cheerios, then he screamed because I poured them out, and proceeded to try and throw them everywhere. He is old enough now that he knows what he is doing. After several similar episodes this morning I'd had enough and really bellowed at him, then walked out of the room. I came back in 2 mins later once he and I had calmed down, and he sat eating very nicely and chatted nicely to me.
Has me wondering that perhaps he just needed to know enough was enough?
He has just had another paddy over my giving him milk, that again he asked for, I sternly said 'that's enough' and he has chilled out again.
I'm not suggesting I shout at him continuously, but do you think sometimes they need it, or am I just trying to justify being a terrible mother?!!